Fujifilm X10 vs Kodak Z950
Portability
83 Imaging
38 Features
57 Overall
45
83 Imaging
38 Features
57 Overall
45
Portability
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Fujifilm X10 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
Fujifilm X10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 350g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Revealed July 2012
- Successor is Fujifilm X20
Kodak Z950
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Revealed June 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm X10 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm X10 versus Kodak Z950, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X10 (12MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is relatively similar but the Fujifilm X10 (2/3") and Z950 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm X10 was unveiled 2 years after the Z950 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm X10 scores versus the Z950 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm X10 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X10 & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X10 Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X10 over the Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm X10 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2012 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 26 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Fujifilm X10
| Z950 | Fujifilm X10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Fujifilm X10 and Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm X10 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm X10 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X10 comes with external measurements of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 350 grams (0.77 lbs) while the Kodak Z950 has measurements of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X10 versus Kodak Z950 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X10 against the Z950.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X10 and Z950 is 83 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm X10 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The picture below should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X10 and Z950.
All in all, both of those cameras provide the same megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X10 provides the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh easier. The newer Fujifilm X10 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X10 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm X10
Portrait photography with Kodak Z950
has manual focus
flash sync is higher than normal (1/1,000 seconds)
includes face detection focus
exports RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (2/3")
focusing manually
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Fujifilm X10 as a Street photography camera
Kodak Z950 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (2/3")
more heavy than average in class (350g)
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than others in class (243 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Fujifilm X10 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak Z950 as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
good battery power (270 per charge)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (2/3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,250s)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Fujifilm X10
Travel photography with Kodak Z950
good battery power (270 CIPA)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (350g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
flash built-in
great zoom (350mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (243 grams)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm X10 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak Z950 as a Landscape photography camera
has manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
good sized screen (2.8 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
good battery power (270 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (2/3")
missing Timelapse mode
focusing manually
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X10 Vlogging highlights
Kodak Z950 Vlogging highlights
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
missing external microphone port
more heavy than average in class (350g)
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic support
heavier than others in class (243 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm X10 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Fujifilm X10 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm X10 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-07-11 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS I | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 49 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.00 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/1000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (70, 30 fps), 320 x 240 (120 fps), 320 x 112 (200 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 350 gr (0.77 lb) | 243 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 50 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 245 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $600 | $250 |