Fujifilm X100F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
79 Imaging
68 Features
69 Overall
68
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Fujifilm X100F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 469g - 127 x 75 x 52mm
- Released January 2017
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X100T
- Replacement is Fujifilm X100V
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
Fujifilm X100F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm X100F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X100F (24MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the Fujifilm X100F (APS-C) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe Fujifilm X100F was launched 4 years later than the TG-830 iHS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X100F being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm X100F matches up against the TG-830 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X100F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X100F & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm X100F Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X100F over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
Fujifilm X100F | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2017 | January 2013 | Fresher by 50 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Fujifilm X100F
TG-830 iHS | Fujifilm X100F |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X100F and Olympus TG-830 iHS
Fujifilm X100F | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm X100F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X100F enjoys exterior dimensions of 127mm x 75mm x 52mm (5.0" x 3.0" x 2.0") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X100F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm X100F and the TG-830 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X100F and TG-830 iHS is 79 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm X100F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X100F and TG-830 iHS.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X100F featuring a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Fujifilm X100F will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X100F will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X100F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X100F vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Fujifilm X100F | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X100F | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2017-01-18 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | X-Processor Pro | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS III | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 368.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 325 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 92% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.60 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, forced, suppressed, slow synchro, commander | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lb) | 214 grams (0.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 127 x 75 x 52mm (5.0" x 3.0" x 2.0") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | 300 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126S | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $1,300 | $0 |