Fujifilm X100T vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
80 Imaging
58 Features
63 Overall
60


65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
Fujifilm X100T vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 440g - 127 x 74 x 52mm
- Introduced September 2014
- Superseded the Fujifilm X100S
- Renewed by Fujifilm X100F
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Released January 2014

Fujifilm X100T vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Fujifilm X100T vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X100T (16MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the Fujifilm X100T (APS-C) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.

The Fujifilm X100T was manufactured 9 months after the Astro Zoom AZ651 so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X100T being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm X100T scores against the Astro Zoom AZ651 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm X100T vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X100T and Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X100T Gallery and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X100T over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Fujifilm X100T | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2014 | ![]() | January 2014 | Newer by 9 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Fujifilm X100T
Astro Zoom AZ651 | Fujifilm X100T | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm X100T and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Fujifilm X100T | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm X100T vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X100T enjoys physical dimensions of 127mm x 74mm x 52mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 440 grams (0.97 lbs) while the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has sizing of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
See the Fujifilm X100T vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X100T versus the Astro Zoom AZ651.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X100T and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 80 and 65 respectively.

Fujifilm X100T vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over technical specs. The image underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X100T and Astro Zoom AZ651.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X100T featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will offer more detail due to its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X100T should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm X100T vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X100T vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications
Fujifilm X100T | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | Fujifilm X100T | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 21 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 24-1560mm (65.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 92% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.00 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, forced, suppressed, slow synchro, commander | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 440 grams (0.97 lb) | 567 grams (1.25 lb) |
Dimensions | 127 x 74 x 52mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.0") | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-95 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $899 | $419 |