Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 262
80 Imaging
58 Features
63 Overall
60


77 Imaging
71 Features
35 Overall
56
Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 262 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Increase to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 440g - 127 x 74 x 52mm
- Introduced September 2014
- Superseded the Fujifilm X100S
- Successor is Fujifilm X100F
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched November 2015
- Alternative Name is Typ 262

Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 262 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 262, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals FujiFilm and Leica. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X100T (16MP) and M Typ 262 (24MP) and the Fujifilm X100T (APS-C) and M Typ 262 (Full frame) have totally different sensor measurements.

The Fujifilm X100T was unveiled 14 months before the M Typ 262 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X100T being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Leica M Typ 262 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm X100T grades versus the M Typ 262 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 262 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X100T and Leica M Typ 262. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X100T Gallery and Leica M Typ 262 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X100T over the Leica M Typ 262
Fujifilm X100T | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Clearer display (+119k dot) |
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Fujifilm X100T
M Typ 262 | Fujifilm X100T | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2015 | ![]() | September 2014 | More recent by 14 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm X100T and Leica M Typ 262
Fujifilm X100T | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 262 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm X100T comes with external measurements of 127mm x 74mm x 52mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.0") along with a weight of 440 grams (0.97 lbs) while the Leica M Typ 262 has specifications of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 262 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X100T against the M Typ 262.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X100T and M Typ 262 is 80 and 77 respectively.

Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 262 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The visual below should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X100T and M Typ 262.
To sum up, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X100T having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Leica M Typ 262 will result in more detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X100T will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 262 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 262 Specifications
Fujifilm X100T | Leica M Typ 262 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Leica |
Model type | Fujifilm X100T | Leica M Typ 262 |
Also called as | - | Typ 262 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2015-11-19 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR Processor II | Maestro |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.9mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 5952 x 3976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Leica M |
Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 59 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 92% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.00 m (at ISO 1600) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, forced, suppressed, slow synchro, commander | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 440 grams (0.97 lb) | 600 grams (1.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 127 x 74 x 52mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.0") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-95 | BP-SCL2 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $899 | $5,069 |