Fujifilm X100T vs Samsung WB800F
80 Imaging
58 Features
63 Overall
60
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Fujifilm X100T vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 440g - 127 x 74 x 52mm
- Launched September 2014
- Old Model is Fujifilm X100S
- Successor is Fujifilm X100F
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm X100T vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below, we are comparing the Fujifilm X100T and Samsung WB800F, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X100T (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly close but the Fujifilm X100T (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X100T was manufactured 21 months later than the WB800F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X100T being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm X100T grades versus the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm X100T vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X100T & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm X100T Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X100T over the Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm X100T | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 21 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm X100T
| WB800F | Fujifilm X100T | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X100T and Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm X100T | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Fujifilm X100T vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X100T enjoys external measurements of 127mm x 74mm x 52mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.0") having a weight of 440 grams (0.97 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X100T and Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm X100T against the WB800F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X100T and WB800F is 80 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm X100T vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by researching specifications. The visual here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X100T and WB800F.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got the exact same resolution but not the same sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X100T contains the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler. The younger Fujifilm X100T is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X100T vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm X100T vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Fujifilm X100T | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm X100T | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 49 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 92% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.00 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, forced, suppressed, slow synchro, commander | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 440 gr (0.97 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 127 x 74 x 52mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.0") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-95 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $899 | $300 |