Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Sport
83 Imaging
39 Features
59 Overall
47
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Sport Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Launched April 2013
- Old Model is Fujifilm X10
- Renewed by Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Sport Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Fujifilm X20 versus Kodak Sport, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and the Sport (12MP) is very close but the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and Sport (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X20 was introduced 2 years after the Sport which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm X20 grades against the Sport with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Sport Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X20 & Kodak EasyShare Sport. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm X20 Gallery & Kodak Sport Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Kodak Sport
| Fujifilm X20 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 29 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 2.8" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.4") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Clearer display (+348k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Fujifilm X20
| Sport | Fujifilm X20 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Kodak Sport
| Fujifilm X20 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Sport Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X20 features outside dimensions of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") with a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Kodak Sport has proportions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X20 versus Kodak Sport in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm X20 vs the Sport.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X20 and Sport is 83 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Sport Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X20 and Sport.
As you can see, each of the cameras have the same resolution but different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X20 features the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The fresher Fujifilm X20 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Sport Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Sport Specifications
| Fujifilm X20 | Kodak EasyShare Sport | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm X20 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-04-29 | 2011-01-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1250 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.8" | 2.4" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 112k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/1000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 353 gr (0.78 lbs) | 175 gr (0.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $500 | $155 |
