Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
83 Imaging
38 Features
59 Overall
46
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Launched April 2013
- Superseded the Fujifilm X10
- Later Model is Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Fujifilm X20 and Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is pretty similar but the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm X20 was brought out 12 months after the TG-1 iHS which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the Fujifilm X20 matches up against the TG-1 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X20 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm X20 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Fujifilm X20 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2013 | May 2012 | More modern by 12 months | |
| Manually focus | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Fujifilm X20
| TG-1 iHS | Fujifilm X20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 610k | 460k | Sharper screen (+150k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Fujifilm X20 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X20 features physical dimensions of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus TG-1 iHS has measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X20 and Olympus TG-1 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm X20 and the TG-1 iHS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X20 and TG-1 iHS is 83 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The pic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X20 and TG-1 iHS.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X20 features the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field less difficult. The fresher Fujifilm X20 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm X20 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X20 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-04-29 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR Processor II | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.8" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/1000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 353 gr (0.78 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $500 | $399 |