Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX4
83 Imaging
38 Features
59 Overall
46
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Launched April 2013
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X10
- Updated by Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Fujifilm X20 versus Ricoh CX4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is fairly close but the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and CX4 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X20 was revealed 2 years later than the CX4 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm X20 grades versus the CX4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X20 & Ricoh CX4. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm X20 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Ricoh CX4
| Fujifilm X20 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2013 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 33 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Fujifilm X20
| CX4 | Fujifilm X20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Ricoh CX4
| Fujifilm X20 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X20 offers physical measurements of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X20 versus Ricoh CX4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm X20 and the CX4.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X20 and CX4 is 83 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by researching specifications. The visual below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X20 and CX4.
Plainly, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X20 using its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Fujifilm X20 will result in extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X20 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Fujifilm X20 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm X20 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-04-29 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR Processor II | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.8" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/1000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 353 gr (0.78 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $500 | $211 |