Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-50
83 Imaging
38 Features
59 Overall
46
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Released April 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm X10
- New Model is Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
Photography Glossary Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Fujifilm X20 versus Ricoh WG-50, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and WG-50 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm X20 was revealed 5 years earlier than the WG-50 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the Fujifilm X20 grades against the WG-50 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X20 and Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X20 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Ricoh WG-50
| Fujifilm X20 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.8" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.1") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Fujifilm X20
| WG-50 | Fujifilm X20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 | April 2013 | Fresher by 49 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Ricoh WG-50
| Fujifilm X20 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X20 provides external dimensions of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X20 versus Ricoh WG-50 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X20 compared to the WG-50.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X20 and WG-50 is 83 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X20 and WG-50.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X20 using its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh WG-50 will resolve more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X20 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Fujifilm X20 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm X20 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-04-29 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/1000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 353g (0.78 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 photos | 300 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $500 | $280 |