Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB35F
83 Imaging
38 Features
59 Overall
46
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Released April 2013
- Older Model is Fujifilm X10
- Later Model is Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB35F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and WB35F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm X20 was revealed 8 months prior to the WB35F so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm X20 grades vs the WB35F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X20 and Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm X20 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm X20 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 2.8" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.1") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Fujifilm X20
| WB35F | Fujifilm X20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | April 2013 | Newer by 8 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm X20 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X20 has got outside dimensions of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB35F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X20 vs the WB35F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X20 and WB35F is 83 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specs. The pic here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X20 and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X20 having a bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Samsung WB35F will offer you greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm X20 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Fujifilm X20 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm X20 | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-04-29 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/1000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 353 gr (0.78 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $500 | $130 |