Clicky

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370

Portability
90
Imaging
38
Features
46
Overall
41
Fujifilm XF1 front
 
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs

Fujifilm XF1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2012
Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched September 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview

Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 and Kodak Easyshare M5370, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and Easyshare M5370 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The Fujifilm XF1 was brought out 13 months later than the Easyshare M5370 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm XF1 grades against the Easyshare M5370 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

 Fujifilm XF1 Easyshare M5370 
LaunchedSeptember 2012September 2011More recent by 13 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Fujifilm XF1

 Easyshare M5370 Fujifilm XF1 
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Kodak Easyshare M5370

 Fujifilm XF1 Easyshare M5370 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm XF1 has got exterior dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm XF1 and Kodak Easyshare M5370 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 against the Easyshare M5370.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XF1 and Easyshare M5370 is 90 and 95 respectively.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XF1 and Easyshare M5370.

As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Kodak Easyshare M5370 will provide you with more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm XF1 provides an edge in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Portrait photography highlights
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Portrait photography highlights
42
manual focus
comes with face detect focus
saves RAW formats
no external flash support
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor (2/3")
34
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
provides face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Street photography information
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Street photography information
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
very small sensor (2/3")
more heavy than competition in class (255 grams)
48
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Sports photography highlights
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sports photography highlights
31
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (2/3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
29
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm XF1
Travel photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
60
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (255 grams)
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
72
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Landscape photography details
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Landscape photography details
54
manual focus
really wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (2/3")
does not have Timelapse recording
43
really wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XF1 Vlogging information
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Vlogging information
34
really wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (255g)
32
really wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
touchscreen capability
provides face detect autofocus
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XF1 and Kodak Easyshare M5370
 Fujifilm XF1Kodak Easyshare M5370
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Kodak
Model type Fujifilm XF1 Kodak Easyshare M5370
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-09-17 2011-09-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 58.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Max enhanced ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/1.8-4.9 -
Macro focusing distance 3cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 4.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter speed 7.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 3.20 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 MPEG-1, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 255g (0.56 lbs) 150g (0.33 lbs)
Dimensions 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 199 not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-50 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $380 $160