Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
90 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Revealed January 2012
- Superseded the Olympus SP-610UZ
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus SP-620 UZ, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm XF1 was introduced 9 months after the SP-620 UZ so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm XF1 scores versus the SP-620 UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus SP-620 UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XF1 Gallery and Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
| Fujifilm XF1 | SP-620 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2012 | January 2012 | More modern by 9 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Fujifilm XF1
| SP-620 UZ | Fujifilm XF1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus SP-620 UZ
| Fujifilm XF1 | SP-620 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XF1 features physical measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Olympus SP-620 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus SP-620 UZ in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 compared to the SP-620 UZ.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XF1 and SP-620 UZ is 90 and 78 respectively.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The pic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XF1 and SP-620 UZ.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XF1 with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus SP-620 UZ will deliver greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XF1 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications
| Fujifilm XF1 | Olympus SP-620 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm XF1 | Olympus SP-620 UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-525mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.1-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lb) | 435 gr (0.96 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 199 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $380 | $199 |