Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus Tough-3000
90 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Fujifilm XF1 versus Olympus Tough-3000, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm XF1 was announced 2 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm XF1 matches up against the Tough-3000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XF1 Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| Fujifilm XF1 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2012 | January 2010 | More recent by 33 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Fujifilm XF1
| Tough-3000 | Fujifilm XF1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Olympus Tough-3000
| Fujifilm XF1 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XF1 features outer dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XF1 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 and the Tough-3000.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XF1 and Tough-3000 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XF1 and Tough-3000.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 uses the bigger sensor which will make obtaining bokeh less difficult. The fresher Fujifilm XF1 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm XF1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Fujifilm XF1 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm XF1 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-09-17 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 pounds) | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 199 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $380 | $0 |