Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB35F
90 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Fujifilm XF1 versus Samsung WB35F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and WB35F (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm XF1 was introduced 15 months earlier than the WB35F making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm XF1 scores versus the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm XF1 & Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm XF1 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm XF1 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Fujifilm XF1
| WB35F | Fujifilm XF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | September 2012 | Fresher by 15 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm XF1 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm XF1 enjoys exterior dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XF1 versus Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 compared to the WB35F.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XF1 and WB35F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at a spec sheet. The visual underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XF1 and WB35F.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XF1 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB35F will resolve more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm XF1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm XF1 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Fujifilm XF1 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm XF1 | Samsung WB35F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 199 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $380 | $130 |