Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Z950
93 Imaging
40 Features
35 Overall
38
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 179g - 104 x 67 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Succeeded the Fujifilm XP70
- New Model is Fujifilm XP90
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Revealed June 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Fujifilm XP80 and Kodak Z950, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP80 (16MP) and Z950 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm XP80 was announced 4 years later than the Z950 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm XP80 scores against the Z950 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XP80 and Kodak EasyShare Z950. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP80 Gallery and Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP80 over the Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm XP80 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2015 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 56 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Fujifilm XP80
| Z950 | Fujifilm XP80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP80 and Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm XP80 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP80 features physical dimensions of 104mm x 67mm x 26mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Kodak Z950 has specifications of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm XP80 and Kodak Z950 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm XP80 against the Z950.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP80 and Z950 is 93 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP80 and Z950.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Fujifilm XP80 to provide you with extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XP80 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XP80 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Fujifilm XP80 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm XP80 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2015-01-14 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 9cm | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m (with Auto ISO) | 5.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 179g (0.39 lbs) | 243g (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 67 x 26mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45S | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, group) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $149 | $250 |