Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A99 II
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
57 Imaging
77 Features
92 Overall
83
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Released September 2016
- Replaced the Sony A99
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A99 II Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A99 II, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and A99 II (42MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and A99 II (Full frame) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VR-320 was released 6 years prior to the A99 II which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A99 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the VR-320 matches up versus the A99 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A99 II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 and Sony Alpha A99 II. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Sony A99 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony A99 II
VR-320 | A99 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A99 II over the Olympus VR-320
A99 II | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | July 2011 | Newer by 62 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Sharper display (+999k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony A99 II
VR-320 | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A99 II Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 has external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony A99 II has specifications of 143mm x 104mm x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") along with a weight of 849 grams (1.87 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A99 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the VR-320 against the A99 II.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and A99 II is 94 and 57 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A99 II Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and A99 II.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sony A99 II will render extra detail as a result of its extra 28MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A99 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 42MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 7952 x 5304 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 399 |
Cross type focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 849 gr (1.87 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 92 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 490 photos |
Battery format | - | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Storage slots | One | Two |
Retail pricing | $179 | $3,198 |