Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z950
91 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
89 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Previous Model is Fujifilm XP80
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Released June 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm XP90 versus Kodak Z950, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP90 (16MP) and Z950 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm XP90 was launched 5 years after the Z950 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm XP90 matches up versus the Z950 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm XP90 & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XP90 Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP90 over the Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm XP90 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2016 | June 2010 | Newer by 68 months | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Fujifilm XP90
| Z950 | Fujifilm XP90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP90 and Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm XP90 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP90 enjoys outside measurements of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") having a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Kodak Z950 has sizing of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm XP90 versus Kodak Z950 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to the Z950.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP90 and Z950 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by researching specs. The pic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP90 and Z950.
All in all, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Fujifilm XP90 to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XP90 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Fujifilm XP90 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm XP90 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2016-01-15 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 9cm | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m (with Auto ISO) | 5.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 203 gr (0.45 pounds) | 243 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45S | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, group) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $180 | $250 |