Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z980
91 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
68 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z980 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Superseded the Fujifilm XP80
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Revealed January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z980 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm XP90 versus Kodak Z980, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP90 (16MP) and Z980 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm XP90 was released 7 years later than the Z980 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm XP90 matches up versus the Z980 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z980 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XP90 & Kodak EasyShare Z980. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP90 Gallery & Kodak Z980 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP90 over the Kodak Z980
| Fujifilm XP90 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2016 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 86 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 201k | Clearer display (+719k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Fujifilm XP90
| Z980 | Fujifilm XP90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP90 and Kodak Z980
| Fujifilm XP90 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z980 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XP90 has got external measurements of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Kodak Z980 has measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XP90 versus Kodak Z980 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm XP90 versus the Z980.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP90 and Z980 is 91 and 68 respectively.
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z980 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at technical specs. The visual underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP90 and Z980.
As you can tell, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Fujifilm XP90 to resolve more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XP90 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z980 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XP90 vs Kodak Z980 Specifications
| Fujifilm XP90 | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm XP90 | Kodak EasyShare Z980 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2016-01-15 | 2009-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 9cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 201 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m (with Auto ISO) | 6.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 203g (0.45 lbs) | 445g (0.98 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45S | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, group) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $180 | $249 |
