Clicky

Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ

Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
43
Overall
41
Fujifilm XP90 front
 
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs

Fujifilm XP90
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
  • Released January 2016
  • Replaced the Fujifilm XP80
Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Revealed February 2010
  • Updated by Olympus SP-810 UZ
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview

In this write-up, we are reviewing the Fujifilm XP90 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP90 (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is fairly similar and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Fujifilm XP90 was revealed 6 years after the SP-800 UZ which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm XP90 grades vs the SP-800 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP90 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 Fujifilm XP90 SP-800 UZ 
RevealedJanuary 2016February 2010More modern by 73 months
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm XP90

 SP-800 UZ Fujifilm XP90 

Common features in the Fujifilm XP90 and Olympus SP-800 UZ

 Fujifilm XP90 SP-800 UZ 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP90 has exterior measurements of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm XP90 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XP90 and the SP-800 UZ.

Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP90 and SP-800 UZ is 91 and 69 respectively.

Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading specs. The pic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP90 and SP-800 UZ.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Fujifilm XP90 to offer you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XP90 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XP90 Portrait photography info
Olympus SP-800 UZ Portrait photography info
36
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
offers face detect focusing
no manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
28
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XP90 Street photography details
Olympus SP-800 UZ Street photography details
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
46
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XP90 Sports photography info
Olympus SP-800 UZ Sports photography info
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
environment proofing
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery life (210 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
47
excellent zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XP90 Travel photography information
Olympus SP-800 UZ Travel photography information
67
environment proofing
megapixel count good (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
bad battery life (210 CIPA)
does not contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
61
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long zoom (840mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XP90 Landscape photography details
Olympus SP-800 UZ Landscape photography details
46
quite wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
environment proofing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
bad battery life (210 shots)
41
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual exposure
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XP90 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Vlogging camera
33
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not contain selfie friendly display
does not have mic jack
24
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP90 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
 Fujifilm XP90Olympus SP-800 UZ
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm XP90 Olympus SP-800 UZ
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2016-01-15 2010-02-02
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Max boosted ISO 6400 1000
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 143
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-840mm (30.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/2.8-5.6
Macro focus distance 9cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 12 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 10.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.40 m (with Auto ISO) 3.10 m
Flash options Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 203 gr (0.45 pounds) 455 gr (1.00 pounds)
Dimensions 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 photos -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-45S Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, group) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $180 $270