Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus TG-320
91 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Launched January 2016
- Succeeded the Fujifilm XP80
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus TG-320, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP90 (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm XP90 was unveiled 4 years after the TG-320 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm XP90 grades versus the TG-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm XP90 and Olympus TG-320. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP90 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP90 over the Olympus TG-320
| Fujifilm XP90 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2016 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 49 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Fujifilm XP90
| TG-320 | Fujifilm XP90 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP90 and Olympus TG-320
| Fujifilm XP90 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP90 has got outer dimensions of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") along with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus TG-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to the TG-320.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP90 and TG-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through specifications. The image below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP90 and TG-320.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the Fujifilm XP90 to resolve more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XP90 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XP90 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Fujifilm XP90 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm XP90 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2016-01-15 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 9cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m (with Auto ISO) | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 203g (0.45 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | 150 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45S | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, group) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $180 | $0 |