Clicky

Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M340

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
55
Overall
45
Fujifilm XQ1 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24

Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M340 Key Specs

Fujifilm XQ1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
  • Released November 2013
  • Updated by Fujifilm XQ2
Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M340 Overview

On this page, we are contrasting the Fujifilm XQ1 versus Kodak M340, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the M340 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and M340 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Fujifilm XQ1 was announced 4 years later than the M340 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm XQ1 scores against the M340 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Kodak M340

 Fujifilm XQ1 M340 
AnnouncedNovember 2013January 2009More recent by 60 months
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Fujifilm XQ1

 M340 Fujifilm XQ1 

Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak M340

 Fujifilm XQ1 M340 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XQ1 has got outer measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Kodak M340 has measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm XQ1 versus Kodak M340 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 vs the M340.

Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M340 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XQ1 and M340 is 92 and 96 respectively.

Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M340 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The graphic below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XQ1 and M340.

To sum up, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm XQ1 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm XQ1 will give you greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XQ1 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M340 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XQ1 Portrait photography factors
Kodak M340 Portrait photography factors
43
manual focus
offers face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (2/3")
19
manual focus not available
no manual mode
no external flash support
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XQ1 Street photography details
Kodak M340 Street photography details
62
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
small sensor size (2/3")
more heavy than competition (206 grams)
47
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm XQ1
Sports photography with Kodak M340
49
image stabilization (Optical)
good battery pack (240 CIPA)
has phase detect autofocus
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (2/3")
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XQ1 Travel photography info
Kodak M340 Travel photography info
64
good battery pack (240 shots)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (206g)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
51
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
MP count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm XQ1
Landscape photography with Kodak M340
56
manual focus
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
good battery pack (240 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (2/3")
missing Timelapse function
22
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XQ1 Vlogging info
Kodak M340 Vlogging info
34
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone port
more heavy than competition (206 grams)
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak M340
 Fujifilm XQ1Kodak EasyShare M340
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Kodak
Model Fujifilm XQ1 Kodak EasyShare M340
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2013-11-26 2009-01-05
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS II CCD
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 58.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 3664 x 2748
Highest native ISO 12800 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 5
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/1.8-4.9 f/3.1-5.7
Macro focus range 3cm 7cm
Focal length multiplier 4.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 12.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, on, off, slow syncho Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 206g (0.45 pounds) 115g (0.25 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-48 KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $500 $130