Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M575
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
95 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced November 2013
- New Model is Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Released January 2010
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M575 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the M575 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and M575 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm XQ1 was announced 3 years after the M575 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm XQ1 matches up vs the M575 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M575 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm XQ1 & Kodak EasyShare M575. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery & Kodak M575 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Kodak M575
| Fujifilm XQ1 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 48 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| M575 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Kodak M575
| Fujifilm XQ1 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ1 has got exterior measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Kodak M575 has dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M575 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 versus the M575.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XQ1 and M575 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specifications. The pic below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XQ1 and M575.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ1 using its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Kodak M575 will resolve extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XQ1 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M575 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Kodak EasyShare M575 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm XQ1 | Kodak EasyShare M575 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-11-26 | 2010-01-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-48 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $500 | $139 |