Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST100
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed November 2013
- New Model is Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST100 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST100, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the ST100 (14MP) is relatively close but the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and ST100 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm XQ1 was introduced 3 years after the ST100 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm XQ1 matches up against the ST100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm XQ1 & Samsung ST100. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery & Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Samsung ST100
| Fujifilm XQ1 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 48 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| ST100 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 920k | Crisper screen (+232k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Samsung ST100
| Fujifilm XQ1 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XQ1 offers exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung ST100 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST100 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 versus the ST100.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XQ1 and ST100 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions only by researching specs. The picture underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XQ1 and ST100.
All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ1 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung ST100 will result in more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XQ1 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Samsung ST100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm XQ1 | Samsung ST100 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-11-26 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.6-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 1,152k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-48 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $500 | $250 |