Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony W320
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Released November 2013
- Successor is Fujifilm XQ2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony W320 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Fujifilm XQ1 versus Sony W320, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Sony. The resolution of the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the W320 (14MP) is fairly close but the Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") and W320 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm XQ1 was released 3 years after the W320 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the Fujifilm XQ1 scores versus the W320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm XQ1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Sony W320
| Fujifilm XQ1 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 48 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| W320 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ1 and Sony W320
| Fujifilm XQ1 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XQ1 features physical measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony W320 has measurements of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XQ1 versus Sony W320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm XQ1 against the W320.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XQ1 and W320 is 92 and 97 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching specifications. The picture underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XQ1 and W320.
Plainly, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ1 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Sony W320 will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XQ1 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm XQ1 vs Sony W320 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm XQ1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-11-26 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 117g (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-48 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $500 | $269 |