Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M575
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
95 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced January 2015
- Previous Model is Fujifilm XQ1
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M575 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Fujifilm XQ2 versus Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) and the M575 (14MP) is fairly similar but the Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") and M575 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm XQ2 was announced 5 years later than the M575 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm XQ2 grades versus the M575 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M575 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm XQ2 & Kodak EasyShare M575. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery & Kodak M575 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Kodak M575
| Fujifilm XQ2 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2015 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 62 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Fujifilm XQ2
| M575 | Fujifilm XQ2 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ2 and Kodak M575
| Fujifilm XQ2 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ2 comes with exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Kodak M575 has dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XQ2 versus Kodak M575 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm XQ2 and the M575.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XQ2 and M575 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The graphic here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XQ2 and M575.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XQ2 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Kodak M575 will deliver more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XQ2 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak M575 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ2 | Kodak EasyShare M575 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm XQ2 | Kodak EasyShare M575 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2015-01-14 | 2010-01-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 152 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-48 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $299 | $139 |