Fujifilm XQ2 vs Nikon S6900
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Nikon S6900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Released January 2015
- Previous Model is Fujifilm XQ1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 181g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2015
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XQ2 vs Nikon S6900 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Fujifilm XQ2 vs Nikon S6900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Nikon. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) and S6900 (16MP) and the Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") and S6900 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm XQ2 was revealed within a month of the S6900 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm XQ2 matches up against the S6900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XQ2 vs Nikon S6900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XQ2 & Nikon Coolpix S6900. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery & Nikon S6900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Nikon S6900
| Fujifilm XQ2 | S6900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6900 over the Fujifilm XQ2
| S6900 | Fujifilm XQ2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm XQ2 and Nikon S6900
| Fujifilm XQ2 | S6900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2015 |  | February 2015 | Similar age |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Nikon S6900 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XQ2 offers outer measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Nikon S6900 has proportions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm XQ2 vs Nikon S6900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm XQ2 versus the S6900.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XQ2 and S6900 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Nikon S6900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking technical specs. The pic here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XQ2 and S6900.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XQ2 with its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Nikon S6900 will give you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively.
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Nikon S6900 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Nikon S6900 Specifications
| Fujifilm XQ2 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model | Fujifilm XQ2 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2015-01-14 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.3-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 2.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow syncho | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 181g (0.40 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | 180 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-48 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $299 | $190 |