Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica T Type 701
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
85 Imaging
58 Features
56 Overall
57
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica T Type 701 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Launched April 2014
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica T Type 701 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica T Type 701, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Leica. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and T Type 701 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and T Type 701 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe X1D II 50C was revealed 5 years after the T Type 701 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summary of how the X1D II 50C scores vs the T Type 701 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica T Type 701 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Leica T Typ 701. The full galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Leica T Type 701 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Leica T Type 701
X1D II 50C | T Type 701 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2019 | April 2014 | More modern by 63 months | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1300k | Sharper screen (+1060k dot) |
Reasons to pick Leica T Type 701 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
T Type 701 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.7" | 3.60" | Bigger screen (+0.1") |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica T Type 701
X1D II 50C | T Type 701 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica T Type 701 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C provides external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Leica T Type 701 has dimensions of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica T Type 701 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the X1D II 50C and the T Type 701.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and T Type 701 is 60 and 85 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica T Type 701 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through technical specs. The pic here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and T Type 701.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give you extra detail because of its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica T Type 701 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica T Type 701 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica T Typ 701 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica T Typ 701 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2014-04-24 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4944 x 3278 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12500 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Leica L |
Total lenses | 13 | 4 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.60 inches | 3.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 2,360k dots | 1,300k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lb) | 384 gr (0.85 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 1082 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP-DC13 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Price at launch | $5,750 | $1,603 |