Clicky

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1

Portability
60
Imaging
85
Features
74
Overall
80
Hasselblad X1D II 50C front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 front
Portability
71
Imaging
52
Features
85
Overall
65

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.60" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 2720 x 1530 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Introduced June 2019
  • Superseded the Hasselblad X1D
  • Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
Olympus E-M1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
  • Launched October 2013
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M1 II
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 Overview

Let's look closer at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-M1 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-M1 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The X1D II 50C was brought out 5 years after the E-M1 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the X1D II 50C scores against the E-M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-M1

 X1D II 50C E-M1 
LaunchedJune 2019October 2013More modern by 69 months
Screen dimensions3.60"3"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution2360k1037kCrisper screen (+1323k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C

 E-M1 X1D II 50C 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-M1

 X1D II 50C E-M1 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C enjoys outer dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 has measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs).

Examine the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the E-M1.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and E-M1 is 60 and 71 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The image underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and E-M1.

Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve more detail having its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer X1D II 50C is going to have an edge in sensor technology.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Portrait photography factors
Olympus E-M1 Portrait photography factors
91
has manual focus
great flash sync speed (1/2,000s)
amazing MP (51MP)
big sensor size (Medium format)
supports RAW files
71
manual focus
above average flash sync speed (1/320 seconds)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Street photography factors
Olympus E-M1 Street photography factors
69
big sensor size (Medium format)
supports RAW files
comes with touch focus
environment proofing
very good high ISO (25,600)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
77
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
provides touch to focus
weather proof
lighter than competitors (497 grams)
above average ISO range (25,600)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sports photography factors
Olympus E-M1 Sports photography factors
73
silent shooting (1/10,000 seconds)
amazing MP (51 megapixels)
big sensor size (Medium format)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proofing
continuous shooting slow (2.7 fps)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
69
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
weather proof
comes with phase detect AF
terrible battery life (350 shots)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Travel photography factors
Olympus E-M1 Travel photography factors
65
environment proofing
comes with touch focus
amazing MP (51MP)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
65
lighter than competitors (497g)
weather proof
provides touch to focus
good MP (16MP)
terrible battery life (350 CIPA)
does not have a selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1
80
has manual focus
change lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
bigger than average screen (3.60")
amazing MP (51MP)
big sensor size (Medium format)
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment proofing
has double storage slots
does not have image stabilization
missing Time Lapse recording
72
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
weather proof
terrible battery life (350 CIPA)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Vlogging advice
Olympus E-M1 Vlogging advice
32
has touchscreen
high quality video (2720 x 1530 pixels)
does have external mic port
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
36
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have mic socket
lighter than competitors (497g)
does not have a selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-M1
 Hasselblad X1D II 50COlympus OM-D E-M1
General Information
Brand Hasselblad Olympus
Model type Hasselblad X1D II 50C Olympus OM-D E-M1
Class Pro Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Introduced 2019-06-19 2013-10-28
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePIC VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Medium format Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 44 x 33mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 1,452.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 51MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 8272 x 6200 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 117 81
Lens
Lens support Hasselblad X Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 13 107
Crop factor 0.8 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3.60 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 2,360k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 3,690k dots 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.87x 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/8000 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/10000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 2.7 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options no built-in flash Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/2000 secs 1/320 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 2720 x 1530 (30p) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 2720x1530 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 725 gr (1.60 lbs) 497 gr (1.10 lbs)
Physical dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 102 73
DXO Color Depth rating 26.2 23.0
DXO Dynamic range rating 14.8 12.7
DXO Low light rating 4489 757
Other
Battery life - 350 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLN-1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Dual Single
Retail pricing $5,750 $799