Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Superseded the Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Launched October 2013
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 II

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 Overview
Let's look closer at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-M1 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-M1 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor dimensions.

The X1D II 50C was brought out 5 years after the E-M1 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the X1D II 50C scores against the E-M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Olympus OM-D E-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Olympus E-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-M1
X1D II 50C | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2019 | ![]() | October 2013 | More modern by 69 months |
Screen dimensions | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper screen (+1323k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-M1 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-M1
X1D II 50C | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C enjoys outer dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 has measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the E-M1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and E-M1 is 60 and 71 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The image underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and E-M1.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve more detail having its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer X1D II 50C is going to have an edge in sensor technology.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus OM-D E-M1 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2013-10-28 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePIC VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 2,360k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | 1/320 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 497 gr (1.10 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 757 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Retail pricing | $5,750 | $799 |