Clicky

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II

Portability
60
Imaging
84
Features
74
Overall
80
Hasselblad X1D II 50C front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.60" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 2720 x 1530 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Launched June 2019
  • Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
  • Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
  • New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview

Let's look a bit more closely at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) boast different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The X1D II 50C was released 2 years later than the E-M1 II and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the X1D II 50C scores against the E-M1 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-M1 II

 X1D II 50C E-M1 II 
RevealedJune 2019September 2016More recent by 34 months
Screen size3.60"3"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution2360k1037kClearer screen (+1323k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C

 E-M1 II X1D II 50C 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-M1 II

 X1D II 50C E-M1 II 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C provides outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 II has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).

Examine the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-M1 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the X1D II 50C and the E-M1 II.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and E-M1 II is 60 and 68 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and E-M1 II.

Clearly, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 31MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer X1D II 50C provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
90
focusing manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/2,000s)
resolution is fantastic (51MP)
sensor size is big (Medium format)
saves RAW files
75
manual focus
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Street photography camera
69
sensor size is big (Medium format)
saves RAW files
comes with focus by touch
environment proof
very good high ISO (25,600)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
has touch focus
weather sealing
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
above average ISO range (25,600)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sports photography info
Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography info
73
quiet mode (1/10,000 seconds)
resolution is fantastic (51MP)
sensor size is big (Medium format)
provides tracking focus
environment proof
continuous shooting slow (2.7 fps)
does not have image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
74
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
max fps high (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
weather sealing
has phase detect autofocus
not so great battery (350 shots)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
64
environment proof
comes with focus by touch
resolution is fantastic (51 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
72
lighter than others in class (574g)
weather sealing
has touch focus
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
not so great battery (350 CIPA)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
80
focusing manually
switch lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
bigger than average screen (3.60 inches)
resolution is fantastic (51 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Medium format)
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proof
has double storage slots
does not have image stabilization
missing Time Lapse mode
76
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
doesnt have low pass filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
two card slots
not so great battery (350 per charge)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Vlogging info
Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging info
32
touchscreen
high res video (2720 x 1530 pxls)
does have mic port
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
has external microphone socket
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-M1 II
 Hasselblad X1D II 50COlympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
General Information
Make Hasselblad Olympus
Model Hasselblad X1D II 50C Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Category Pro Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Launched 2019-06-19 2016-09-19
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Medium format Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 44 x 33mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 1,452.0mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 51MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 4:3
Maximum resolution 8272 x 6200 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW data
Min boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 117 121
Lens
Lens mounting type Hasselblad X Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 13 107
Crop factor 0.8 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 3.60" 3"
Screen resolution 2,360k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 3,690k dots 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.87x 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/8000s
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/10000s 1/32000s
Continuous shooting rate 2.7 frames per second 60.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 9.10 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes no built-in flash Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/2000s 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 2720 x 1530 (30p) 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 2720x1530 4096x2160
Video file format H.264 MOV, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 725g (1.60 lb) 574g (1.27 lb)
Physical dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 102 80
DXO Color Depth score 26.2 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score 14.8 12.8
DXO Low light score 4489 1312
Other
Battery life - 350 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLH-1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots
Card slots 2 2
Cost at launch $5,750 $1,700