Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II
60 Imaging
84 Features
74 Overall
80
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) boast different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X1D II 50C was released 2 years later than the E-M1 II and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the X1D II 50C scores against the E-M1 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The complete galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-M1 II
| X1D II 50C | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2019 | September 2016 | More recent by 34 months | |
| Screen size | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 2360k | 1037k | Clearer screen (+1323k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
| E-M1 II | X1D II 50C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-M1 II
| X1D II 50C | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C provides outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 II has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-M1 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the X1D II 50C and the E-M1 II.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and E-M1 II is 60 and 68 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and E-M1 II.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 31MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer X1D II 50C provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
| Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Hasselblad | Olympus |
| Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2019-06-19 | 2016-09-19 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 117 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 13 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3.60" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/10000s | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000s | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 4096x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MOV, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 725g (1.60 lb) | 574g (1.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 102 | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light score | 4489 | 1312 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
| Card slots | 2 | 2 |
| Cost at launch | $5,750 | $1,700 |