Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P1
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Older Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Updated by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Announced July 2009
- Later Model is Olympus E-P2

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P1 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-P1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-P1 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-P1 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

The X1D II 50C was released 10 years after the E-P1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the X1D II 50C scores versus the E-P1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Olympus PEN E-P1. The complete galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Olympus E-P1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-P1
X1D II 50C | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2019 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 121 months |
Display dimensions | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+2130k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-P1 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-P1
X1D II 50C | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Olympus E-P1 has measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-P1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the X1D II 50C and the E-P1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and E-P1 is 60 and 86 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The image here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and E-P1.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will show more detail as a result of its extra 39MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher X1D II 50C is going to have an edge in sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P1 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-P1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-P1 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2009-07-29 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | 55 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Retail pricing | $5,750 | $182 |