Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus VR-320 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") have totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-320 was released 17 months prior to the XZ-2 iHS which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the VR-320 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-320 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| VR-320 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus VR-320
| XZ-2 iHS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 | July 2011 | Newer by 17 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| VR-320 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 provides external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the VR-320 against the XZ-2 iHS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specifications. The image underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus VR-320 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158g (0.35 lb) | 346g (0.76 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $179 | $450 |