Clicky

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2

Portability
60
Imaging
85
Features
74
Overall
80
Hasselblad X1D II 50C front
 
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.60" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 2720 x 1530 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Released June 2019
  • Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
  • New Model is Hasselblad X2D
Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Released April 2010
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Successor is Olympus E-P3
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 Overview

Below is a complete overview of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-P2, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-P2 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-P2 (Four Thirds) enjoy different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The X1D II 50C was announced 9 years later than the E-P2 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the X1D II 50C grades versus the E-P2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-P2

 X1D II 50C E-P2 
ReleasedJune 2019April 2010More recent by 112 months
Display sizing3.60"3"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution2360k230kCrisper display (+2130k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C

 E-P2 X1D II 50C 

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-P2

 X1D II 50C E-P2 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got external dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P2 has measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-P2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the E-P2.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and E-P2 is 60 and 86 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by seeing technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and E-P2.

As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will produce extra detail with its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The newer X1D II 50C should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Portrait photography info
Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography info
91
you can focus manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/2,000 seconds)
high sensor resolution (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
delivers RAW formats
60
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Street photography advice
Olympus E-P2 Street photography advice
69
sensor size is great (Medium format)
delivers RAW formats
supports touch focus
environment proof
great high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Sports photography with Olympus E-P2
73
silent shutter (1/10,000 seconds)
high sensor resolution (51MP)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
has tracking focus
environment proof
continuous shooting slow (2.7 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
lack of phase detect auto focus
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (300 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Travel photography information
Olympus E-P2 Travel photography information
65
environment proof
supports touch focus
high sensor resolution (51 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse function
does not offer selfie friendly screen
43
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery life (300 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Landscape photography details
Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography details
80
you can focus manually
change lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
very good size screen (3.60 inches)
high sensor resolution (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
environment proof
2 card slots
does not have image stabilization
does not have Timelapse function
60
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12MP)
terrible battery life (300 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Vlogging with Olympus E-P2
32
screen is touchscreen
high res video (2720 x 1530 pixels)
comes with microphone support
does not offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection focus
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic support
Photography Glossary

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-P2
 Hasselblad X1D II 50COlympus PEN E-P2
General Information
Manufacturer Hasselblad Olympus
Model type Hasselblad X1D II 50C Olympus PEN E-P2
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2019-06-19 2010-04-22
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Medium format Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 44 x 33mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 1,452.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 51 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 8272 x 6200 4032 x 3024
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 117 11
Lens
Lens mount type Hasselblad X Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 13 107
Crop factor 0.8 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3.60 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 2,360k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 3,690k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.87x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/10000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 2.7 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/2000 secs 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 2720 x 1530 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 2720x1530 1280x720
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 725 grams (1.60 lbs) 355 grams (0.78 lbs)
Dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 102 56
DXO Color Depth rating 26.2 21.5
DXO Dynamic range rating 14.8 10.4
DXO Low light rating 4489 505
Other
Battery life - 300 images
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC card
Card slots 2 One
Launch pricing $5,750 $799