Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
- New Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
- Successor is Olympus E-P3
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 Overview
Below is a complete overview of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-P2, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-P2 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-P2 (Four Thirds) enjoy different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe X1D II 50C was announced 9 years later than the E-P2 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the X1D II 50C grades versus the E-P2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Olympus PEN E-P2. The whole galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Olympus E-P2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-P2
X1D II 50C | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2019 | April 2010 | More recent by 112 months | |
Display sizing | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 230k | Crisper display (+2130k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-P2 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-P2
X1D II 50C | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got external dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P2 has measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-P2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the E-P2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and E-P2 is 60 and 86 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by seeing technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and E-P2.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will produce extra detail with its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The newer X1D II 50C should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-P2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-P2 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2010-04-22 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 2,360k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lbs) | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 56 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Launch pricing | $5,750 | $799 |