Clicky

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8

Portability
60
Imaging
84
Features
74
Overall
80
Hasselblad X1D II 50C front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL8 front
Portability
86
Imaging
54
Features
76
Overall
62

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.60" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 2720 x 1530 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Launched June 2019
  • Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D
  • Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Older Model is Olympus E-PL7
  • Updated by Olympus E-PL9
Photography Glossary

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PL8 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PL8 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The X1D II 50C was unveiled 2 years later than the E-PL8 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the E-PL8 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PL8

 X1D II 50C E-PL8 
IntroducedJune 2019September 2016Fresher by 34 months
Display dimension3.60"3"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution2360k1037kCrisper display (+1323k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C

 E-PL8 X1D II 50C 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL8

 X1D II 50C E-PL8 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C comes with outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL8 has measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).

Look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the E-PL8.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and E-PL8 is 60 and 86 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and E-PL8.

Clearly, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The X1D II 50C having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve greater detail having an extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL8
90
focusing manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/2,000 seconds)
excellent MP (51MP)
great sensor size (Medium format)
supports RAW formats
72
has manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Street photography with Olympus E-PL8
69
great sensor size (Medium format)
supports RAW formats
boasts touch to focus
environment proofing
great ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
84
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
provides focus by touch
great ISO range (25,600)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sports photography info
Olympus E-PL8 Sports photography info
73
quiet shooting (1/10,000s)
excellent MP (51 megapixels)
great sensor size (Medium format)
features tracking focus
environment proofing
max frames per second very slow (2.7 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
67
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Travel photography with Olympus E-PL8
64
environment proofing
boasts touch to focus
excellent MP (51 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
71
provides focus by touch
decent MP (16 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Landscape photography advice
Olympus E-PL8 Landscape photography advice
80
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
bigger than average screen (3.60 inches)
excellent MP (51MP)
great sensor size (Medium format)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
environment proofing
2 card slots
lack of image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse mode
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Vlogging information
Olympus E-PL8 Vlogging information
32
built-in touchscreen
video res high (2720 x 1530 pxls)
includes mic support
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
35
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL8
 Hasselblad X1D II 50COlympus PEN E-PL8
General Information
Manufacturer Hasselblad Olympus
Model type Hasselblad X1D II 50C Olympus PEN E-PL8
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2019-06-19 2016-09-19
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Medium format Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 44 x 33mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 1,452.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 51 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 8272 x 6200 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Min boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 117 81
Lens
Lens mount type Hasselblad X Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 13 107
Crop factor 0.8 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3.60 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 2,360k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 3,690k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.87x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Highest silent shutter speed 1/10000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 2.7fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings no built-in flash no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/2000 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 2720 x 1530 (30p) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 2720x1530 1920x1080
Video format H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 725 gr (1.60 pounds) 357 gr (0.79 pounds)
Dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 102 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 26.2 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 14.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 4489 not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 photos
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots 2 One
Launch price $5,750 $500