Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8
60 Imaging
84 Features
74 Overall
80


86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Updated by Olympus E-PL9

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PL8 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PL8 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor measurements.

The X1D II 50C was unveiled 2 years later than the E-PL8 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the E-PL8 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus PEN E-PL8. The full galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Olympus E-PL8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PL8
X1D II 50C | E-PL8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | ![]() | September 2016 | Fresher by 34 months |
Display dimension | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper display (+1323k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-PL8 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL8
X1D II 50C | E-PL8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C comes with outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL8 has measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).
Look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the E-PL8.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and E-PL8 is 60 and 86 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and E-PL8.
Clearly, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The X1D II 50C having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve greater detail having an extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL8 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL8 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-06-19 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 2,360k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 357 gr (0.79 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Launch price | $5,750 | $500 |