Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM2
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PM2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizing.

The X1D II 50C was unveiled 6 years later than the E-PM2 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the X1D II 50C scores versus the E-PM2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus PEN E-PM2. The full galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PM2
X1D II 50C | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2019 | ![]() | May 2013 | More recent by 74 months |
Display dimensions | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+1900k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-PM2 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PM2
X1D II 50C | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got external dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PM2 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PM2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the E-PM2.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and E-PM2 is 60 and 89 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The visual underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D II 50C and E-PM2.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give you greater detail having an extra 35MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2013-05-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.60" | 3" |
Display resolution | 2,360k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Price at release | $5,750 | $448 |