Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic F5
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
96 Imaging
38 Features
23 Overall
32
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic F5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
- 121g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic F5 Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic F5, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the F5 (14MP) is very comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and F5 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed within a month of the F5 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the F5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic F5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic F5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic F5
| XZ-2 iHS | F5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic F5 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| F5 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic F5
| XZ-2 iHS | F5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic F5 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic F5 has proportions of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic F5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS against the F5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and F5 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic F5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and F5.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Panasonic F5 will provide more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic F5 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic F5 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.2-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photos | 250 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $450 | $100 |
