Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus PEN-F
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus PEN-F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
- Renewed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Revealed January 2016
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus PEN-F Overview
Let's look much closer at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus PEN-F, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and PEN-F (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and PEN-F (Four Thirds) come with different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe X1D II 50C was released 3 years after the PEN-F which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the X1D II 50C matches up vs the PEN-F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus PEN-F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus PEN-F. The complete galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Olympus PEN-F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus PEN-F
X1D II 50C | PEN-F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2019 | January 2016 | More modern by 42 months | |
Screen dimension | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1037k | Crisper screen (+1323k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
PEN-F | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus PEN-F
X1D II 50C | PEN-F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus PEN-F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C provides physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Olympus PEN-F has proportions of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") along with a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus PEN-F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the X1D II 50C against the PEN-F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and PEN-F is 60 and 84 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus PEN-F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing specs. The picture here might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and PEN-F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will show more detail as a result of its extra 31MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer X1D II 50C should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus PEN-F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus PEN-F Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN-F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN-F |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2016-01-27 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3.60" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lb) | 427 gr (0.94 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 894 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | One |
Launch cost | $5,750 | $1,000 |