Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
60 Imaging
84 Features
74 Overall
80
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Newer Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe X1D II 50C was brought out 8 years later than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The entire galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
| X1D II 50C | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2019 | September 2010 | More recent by 107 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
| Display resolution | 2360k | 920k | Clearer display (+1440k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
| GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | X1D II 50C |
|---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
| X1D II 50C | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C comes with outer dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 60 and 88 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements just by seeing technical specs. The visual here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will produce more detail having its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
| Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Hasselblad | Ricoh |
| Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2019-06-19 | 2010-09-21 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | GR Engine III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 117 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5 |
| Total lenses | 13 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 2,360k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.7fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lbs) | 140 grams (0.31 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 102 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 2 | One |
| Launch pricing | $5,750 | $566 |