Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
60 Imaging
84 Features
74 Overall
80


84 Imaging
52 Features
39 Overall
46
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Older Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Revealed August 2011

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) have different sensor size.

The X1D II 50C was brought out 7 years later than the GXR Mount A12 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the X1D II 50C grades versus the GXR Mount A12 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
X1D II 50C | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2019 | ![]() | August 2011 | Fresher by 96 months |
Display size | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+1440k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
GXR Mount A12 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
X1D II 50C | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C enjoys physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has proportions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the GXR Mount A12.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and GXR Mount A12 is 60 and 84 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and GXR Mount A12.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The X1D II 50C due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will offer you extra detail having its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher X1D II 50C provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Ricoh |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2011-08-05 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | () |
Total lenses | 13 | - |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 2,360 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/9000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.7fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 9.60 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 370 gr (0.82 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Cost at launch | $5,750 | $349 |