Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX300M
60 Imaging
86 Features
74 Overall
81
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
- New Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Revealed January 2013
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX300M Overview
Below, we are comparing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX300M, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and NX300M (APS-C) possess different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe X1D II 50C was released 6 years after the NX300M which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the NX300M in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX300M. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Samsung NX300M
X1D II 50C | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2019 | January 2013 | Newer by 79 months | |
Display dimension | 3.60" | 3.3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 768k | Sharper display (+1592k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
NX300M | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX300M
X1D II 50C | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C features external dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Samsung NX300M has dimensions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX300M in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the NX300M.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and NX300M is 60 and 86 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specs. The pic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D II 50C and NX300M.
All in all, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 31MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher X1D II 50C provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX300M | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Samsung |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX300M |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2013-01-03 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Samsung NX |
Number of lenses | 13 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.60 inch | 3.3 inch |
Screen resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 768 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 pounds) | 331g (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Launch price | $5,750 | $699 |