Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-3N
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2019
- Previous Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Superseded the Sony NEX-F3
- New Model is Sony a5000
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Sony NEX-3N, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and NEX-3N (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe X1D II 50C was announced 6 years after the NEX-3N which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the NEX-3N in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The whole galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Sony NEX-3N
X1D II 50C | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2019 | February 2013 | Newer by 77 months | |
Screen sizing | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 460k | Crisper screen (+1900k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
NEX-3N | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony NEX-3N
X1D II 50C | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C provides external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has dimensions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Sony NEX-3N in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the X1D II 50C against the NEX-3N.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and NEX-3N is 60 and 89 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and NEX-3N.
As you can see, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will render greater detail with its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C will have an edge in sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-06-19 | 2013-02-25 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Total lenses | 13 | 121 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 2,360k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 480 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Pricing at release | $5,750 | $399 |