Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M9
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
79 Imaging
63 Features
30 Overall
49
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2016
- Replacement is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Released September 2009
- Renewed by Leica M9-P
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M9 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M9, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Hasselblad and Leica. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and M9 (18MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and M9 (Full frame) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe X1D was introduced 6 years after the M9 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the X1D scores versus the M9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M9 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D and Leica M9. The whole galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Leica M9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Leica M9
X1D | M9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2016 | September 2009 | More modern by 83 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M9 over the Hasselblad X1D
M9 | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Leica M9
X1D | M9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M9 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D enjoys outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Leica M9 has specifications of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Look at the Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M9 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the X1D versus the M9.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and M9 is 60 and 79 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M9 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading specifications. The pic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D and M9.
To sum up, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D with its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will offer more detail using its extra 33 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger X1D will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica M9 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Leica M9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Leica M9 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-06-22 | 2009-09-09 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5212 x 3472 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 2500 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Leica M |
Number of lenses | 4 | 59 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.3 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lbs) | 585 grams (1.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 884 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Pricing at release | $6,495 | $2,750 |