Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-30 was released 5 years prior to the TG-850 iHS which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-30 grades against the TG-850 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-30 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-30 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-30
TG-850 iHS | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | March 2009 | More modern by 59 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-30 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-30 enjoys physical measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Olympus TG-850 iHS has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-30 vs the TG-850 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and TG-850 iHS is 60 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by checking specifications. The picture underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-30 and TG-850 iHS.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-30 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-850 iHS will give extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-30 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-03-24 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4616 x 3464 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695 grams (1.53 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 photographs | 330 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $1,299 | $250 |