Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q2 Monochrom
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
60 Imaging
81 Features
66 Overall
75
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q2 Monochrom Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Later Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 100000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 28mm (F1.7) lens
- 734g - 130 x 80 x 92mm
- Announced October 2020
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q2 Monochrom Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Hasselblad X1D and Leica Q2 Monochrom, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Hasselblad and Leica. The sensor resolution of the X1D (51MP) and the Q2 Monochrom (47MP) is pretty close but the X1D (Medium format) and Q2 Monochrom (Full frame) feature totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe X1D was announced 5 years prior to the Q2 Monochrom which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Leica Q2 Monochrom being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the X1D matches up versus the Q2 Monochrom when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q2 Monochrom Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D & Leica Q2 Monochrom. The whole galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Leica Q2 Monochrom Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Leica Q2 Monochrom
X1D | Q2 Monochrom |
---|
Reasons to pick Leica Q2 Monochrom over the Hasselblad X1D
Q2 Monochrom | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2020 | June 2016 | Newer by 52 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Leica Q2 Monochrom
X1D | Q2 Monochrom | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q2 Monochrom Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D features physical dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Leica Q2 Monochrom has proportions of 130mm x 80mm x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 734 grams (1.62 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D and Leica Q2 Monochrom in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the X1D vs the Q2 Monochrom.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and Q2 Monochrom is 60 and 60 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q2 Monochrom Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching specs. The pic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D and Q2 Monochrom.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will result in greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged X1D will be behind in sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q2 Monochrom Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q2 Monochrom Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Leica Q2 Monochrom | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Leica Q2 Monochrom |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-06-22 | 2020-10-11 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 47 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 8368 x 5584 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 100000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 17cm |
Number of lenses | 4 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 3,680k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.76x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/40000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.3 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000 secs | 1/500 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | none |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 734 gr (1.62 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 130 x 80 x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP-SCL4 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Cost at release | $6,495 | $5,995 |