Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q3
60 Imaging
81 Features
74 Overall
78
60 Imaging
83 Features
77 Overall
80
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 60MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Screen
- ISO 50 - 100000
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 8192 x 4320 video
- 28mm (F1.7) lens
- 743g - 130 x 80 x 93mm
- Revealed May 2023
- Superseded the Leica Q2
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q3 Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q3, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Hasselblad and Leica. The resolution of the X1D (51MP) and the Q3 (60MP) is relatively comparable but the X1D (Medium format) and Q3 (Full frame) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe X1D was manufactured 8 years earlier than the Q3 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Leica Q3 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the X1D scores vs the Q3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D & Leica Q3. The entire galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Leica Q3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Leica Q3
| X1D | Q3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Leica Q3 over the Hasselblad X1D
| Q3 | X1D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2023 | June 2016 | More modern by 84 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1843k | 920k | Sharper screen (+923k dot) |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Leica Q3
| X1D | Q3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3.00" | Identical screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q3 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D has outside dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Leica Q3 has sizing of 130mm x 80mm x 93mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 743 grams (1.64 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the X1D versus the Q3.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D and Q3 is 60 and 60 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The image here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D and Q3.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Leica Q3 will show more detail due to its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged X1D will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Hasselblad X1D vs Leica Q3 Specifications
| Hasselblad X1D | Leica Q3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Hasselblad | Leica |
| Model | Hasselblad X1D | Leica Q3 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-06-22 | 2023-05-25 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51MP | 60MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 9520 x 6336 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 100000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 315 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.7 |
| Macro focus range | - | 17cm |
| Available lenses | 4 | - |
| Crop factor | 0.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.00 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 1,843k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 5,760k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.79x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 120 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/40000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.3fps | 15.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | 1/500 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | C8K/8K at 30p/25/24p, C4K/4K at 60/50/30/24p, 1080p at 120/100/60/50/30/24p |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 8192x4320 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 725g (1.60 pounds) | 743g (1.64 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 130 x 80 x 93mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 102 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BP-SCL6 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Dual | Single |
| Pricing at release | $6,495 | $5,999 |