Clicky

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II

Portability
60
Imaging
83
Features
74
Overall
79
Hasselblad X1D front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Announced June 2016
  • Refreshed by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview

Here is a comprehensive overview of the Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The X1D was manufactured 2 months prior to the E-M1 II and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the X1D matches up vs the E-M1 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Olympus E-M1 II

 X1D E-M1 II 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Hasselblad X1D

 E-M1 II X1D 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k920kClearer display (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Olympus E-M1 II

 X1D E-M1 II 
RevealedJune 2016September 2016Similar generation
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D enjoys external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).

Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the X1D against the E-M1 II.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and E-M1 II is 60 and 68 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison

Normally, its tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D and E-M1 II.

Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The X1D due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will give you greater detail due to its extra 31MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Hasselblad X1D
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
89
has manual focus
high flash sync (1/2,000s)
MP count fantastic (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
supports face detection focus
delivers RAW files
76
manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Hasselblad X1D
Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
68
sensor size is great (Medium format)
delivers RAW files
supports touch to focus
weather sealing
above average ISO range (25,600)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
78
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
supports focus by touch
weather sealing
lighter than competition (574g)
good high ISO (25,600)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Hasselblad X1D as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
70
MP count fantastic (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
supports tracking autofocus
weather sealing
max frames per second very slow (2.3 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
lack of phase detect auto focus
75
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
high max frames per second (60.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
supports phase detect autofocus
terrible battery power (350 per charge)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Hasselblad X1D
Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
64
weather sealing
supports touch to focus
MP count fantastic (51MP)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
72
lighter than competition (574 grams)
weather sealing
supports focus by touch
resolution is good (20MP)
selfie friendly display
terrible battery power (350 CIPA)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Hasselblad X1D
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 II
80
has manual focus
switch lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
MP count fantastic (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
two card slots
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
76
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather sealing
has dual storage slots
terrible battery power (350 per charge)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D Vlogging factors
Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging factors
33
touchscreen
supports face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
comes with external microphone socket
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with mic jack
lighter than competition (574 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D and Olympus E-M1 II
 Hasselblad X1DOlympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
General Information
Manufacturer Hasselblad Olympus
Model Hasselblad X1D Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Category Pro Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Announced 2016-06-22 2016-09-19
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Medium format Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 44 x 33mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 1,452.0mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 51 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 4:3
Full resolution 8272 x 6200 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 25600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW format
Minimum boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 121
Lens
Lens mount Hasselblad X Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 4 107
Crop factor 0.8 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 1,037 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/8000s
Highest quiet shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting speed 2.3fps 60.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 9.10 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes no built-in flash Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/2000s 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25p) 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 1920x1080 4096x2160
Video file format H.264 MOV, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 725 grams (1.60 lb) 574 grams (1.27 lb)
Dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 102 80
DXO Color Depth score 26.2 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score 14.8 12.8
DXO Low light score 4489 1312
Other
Battery life - 350 pictures
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLH-1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots
Storage slots Two Two
Retail pricing $6,495 $1,700