Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2016
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe X1D was manufactured 2 months prior to the E-M1 II and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the X1D matches up vs the E-M1 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The entire galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Olympus E-M1 II
X1D | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Hasselblad X1D
E-M1 II | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Clearer display (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Olympus E-M1 II
X1D | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2016 | September 2016 | Similar generation | |
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D enjoys external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the X1D against the E-M1 II.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and E-M1 II is 60 and 68 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D and E-M1 II.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The X1D due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will give you greater detail due to its extra 31MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-06-22 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 4 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.3fps | 60.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/2000s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MOV, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 574 grams (1.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | Two | Two |
Retail pricing | $6,495 | $1,700 |