Clicky

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III

Portability
60
Imaging
82
Features
74
Overall
78
Hasselblad X1D front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Launched June 2016
  • Later Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Released February 2020
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
Photography Glossary

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview

The following is a extended review of the Hasselblad X1D versus Olympus E-M1 III, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and E-M1 III (20MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The X1D was unveiled 4 years before the E-M1 III which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the X1D grades versus the E-M1 III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

				

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Olympus E-M1 III

 X1D E-M1 III 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Hasselblad X1D

 E-M1 III X1D 
ReleasedFebruary 2020June 2016Newer by 44 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k920kCrisper display (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Olympus E-M1 III

 X1D E-M1 III 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D has physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 III has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).

See the Hasselblad X1D versus Olympus E-M1 III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the X1D and the E-M1 III.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and E-M1 III is 60 and 67 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by going through specs. The pic underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D and E-M1 III.

All in all, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D with its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D will show extra detail having an extra 31MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged X1D will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Hasselblad X1D
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 III
89
has manual focus
flash sync is higher than normal (1/2,000 seconds)
fantastic megapixels (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
includes face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
77
manual focus
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focus
saves RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Hasselblad X1D as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-M1 III as a Street photography camera
68
sensor size is great (Medium format)
supports RAW files
comes with focus by touch
environment sealing
very good ISO range (25,600)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
78
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
comes with focus by touch
environment proof
above average high ISO (25,600)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Hasselblad X1D
Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 III
69
fantastic megapixels (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
includes tracking autofocus
environment sealing
continuous shooting slow (2.3 fps)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
81
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet shooting (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
environment proof
comes with phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Hasselblad X1D Travel photography info
Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography info
64
environment sealing
comes with focus by touch
fantastic megapixels (51MP)
missing Time Lapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly screen
79
environment proof
connects via bluetooth
comes with focus by touch
good MP (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Hasselblad X1D Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography highlights
79
has manual focus
swap lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
screen size is decent (3")
fantastic megapixels (51MP)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
has double storage slots
lack of image stabilization
missing Time Lapse mode
81
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proof
two card slots
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D Vlogging information
Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging information
33
built-in touchscreen
includes face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have external mic port
does not contain selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
does have mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D and Olympus E-M1 III
 Hasselblad X1DOlympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
General Information
Manufacturer Hasselblad Olympus
Model Hasselblad X1D Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Type Pro Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Launched 2016-06-22 2020-02-11
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic IX
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Medium format Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 44 x 33mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 1,452.0mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 51 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 4:3
Highest resolution 8272 x 6200 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 25600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Minimum boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 121
Cross focus points - 121
Lens
Lens mount Hasselblad X Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 4 107
Focal length multiplier 0.8 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Maximum quiet shutter speed - 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 2.3 frames per second 60.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options no built-in flash Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/2000 seconds 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25p) 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 4096x2160
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 725g (1.60 lbs) 580g (1.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 102 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 26.2 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 14.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 4489 not tested
Other
Battery life - 420 pictures
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLH-1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot)
Card slots Two Two
Cost at launch $6,495 $1,800