Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78


67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2016
- Later Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview
The following is a extended review of the Hasselblad X1D versus Olympus E-M1 III, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and E-M1 III (20MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor dimensions.

The X1D was unveiled 4 years before the E-M1 III which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the X1D grades versus the E-M1 III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. The full galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Olympus E-M1 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Olympus E-M1 III
X1D | E-M1 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Hasselblad X1D
E-M1 III | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2020 | ![]() | June 2016 | Newer by 44 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+117k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Olympus E-M1 III
X1D | E-M1 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D has physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 III has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
See the Hasselblad X1D versus Olympus E-M1 III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the X1D and the E-M1 III.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and E-M1 III is 60 and 67 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by going through specs. The pic underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D and E-M1 III.
All in all, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D with its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D will show extra detail having an extra 31MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged X1D will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-06-22 | 2020-02-11 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic IX |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Cross focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 4 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.3 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lbs) | 580g (1.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
Card slots | Two | Two |
Cost at launch | $6,495 | $1,800 |