Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM1
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2016
- Later Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released November 2011
- Successor is Olympus E-PM2
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and E-PM1 (12MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and E-PM1 (Four Thirds) use different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe X1D was unveiled 4 years after the E-PM1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the X1D scores against the E-PM1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D & Olympus PEN E-PM1. The full galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Olympus E-PM1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Olympus E-PM1
X1D | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2016 | November 2011 | Newer by 56 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Hasselblad X1D
E-PM1 | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Olympus E-PM1
X1D | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D comes with external dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM1 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the X1D vs the E-PM1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and E-PM1 is 60 and 89 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out specs. The pic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D and E-PM1.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The X1D using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will provide extra detail having an extra 39MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The younger X1D provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Olympus PEN E-PM1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-06-22 | 2011-11-23 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 4 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.3 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lbs) | 265g (0.58 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 52 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 21.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Dual | Single |
Cost at launch | $6,495 | $499 |