Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX300M
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78


86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Updated by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Revealed January 2013

Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX300M Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX300M, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and NX300M (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.

The X1D was manufactured 3 years later than the NX300M and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the X1D matches up versus the NX300M in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D and Samsung NX300M. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Samsung NX300M
X1D | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2016 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 43 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 768k | Sharper screen (+152k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Hasselblad X1D
NX300M | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Samsung NX300M
X1D | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D offers outside dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300M has specifications of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX300M in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the X1D and the NX300M.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D and NX300M is 60 and 86 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D and NX300M.
All in all, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The X1D because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will resolve extra detail due to its extra 31 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher X1D should have a benefit in sensor technology.

Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Samsung NX300M | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Samsung |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D | Samsung NX300M |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-06-22 | 2013-01-03 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Samsung NX |
Number of lenses | 4 | 32 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 768 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.3 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 pounds) | 331 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Price at release | $6,495 | $699 |