Hasselblad X1D vs Sony T90
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
96 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony T90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2016
- Updated by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 148g - 94 x 57 x 15mm
- Announced February 2009
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony T90 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Hasselblad X1D and Sony T90, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Hasselblad and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and T90 (12MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and T90 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe X1D was revealed 7 years after the T90 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T90 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the X1D scores against the T90 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony T90 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90. The full galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Sony T90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Sony T90
X1D | T90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2016 | February 2009 | Newer by 90 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T90 over the Hasselblad X1D
T90 | X1D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Sony T90
X1D | T90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony T90 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D features external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Sony T90 has dimensions of 94mm x 57mm x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") and a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Hasselblad X1D and Sony T90 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the X1D and the T90.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D and T90 is 60 and 96 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony T90 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specifications. The picture underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D and T90.
To sum up, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The X1D with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 39MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more modern X1D is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony T90 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony T90 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2016-06-22 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Medium format | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Number of lenses | 4 | - |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.3 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lb) | 148g (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 94 x 57 x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Cost at launch | $6,495 | $259 |