Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701
56 Imaging
92 Features
78 Overall
86
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b93bb/b93bba7fcb410759a6af7d6ef8e106b975761480" alt="Hasselblad X2D 100c front Hasselblad X2D 100c front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/082af/082af5f544755bcbd06b5586c7ba8af1b899da69" alt="Leica T Typ 701 front Leica T Typ 701 front"
85 Imaging
58 Features
56 Overall
57
Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Introduced September 2022
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Revealed April 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Hasselblad X2D and Leica T Type 701, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Leica. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and T Type 701 (16MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and T Type 701 (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The X2D was introduced 8 years after the T Type 701 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the X2D grades against the T Type 701 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X2D 100c and Leica T Typ 701. The whole galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X2D Gallery and Leica T Type 701 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Leica T Type 701
X2D | T Type 701 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2022 | ![]() | April 2014 | More modern by 102 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1300k | Clearer screen (+1060k dot) |
Reasons to pick Leica T Type 701 over the Hasselblad X2D
T Type 701 | X2D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.7" | ![]() | 3.60" | Bigger screen (+0.1") |
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Leica T Type 701
X2D | T Type 701 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X2D provides outer measurements of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") and a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) and the Leica T Type 701 has proportions of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X2D and Leica T Type 701 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the X2D vs the T Type 701.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0258f/0258f3b58f3f9644dab3b104f7e1f3e508733511" alt="Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 size comparison Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X2D and T Type 701 is 56 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c76f/4c76f287d59a00564d541fb2ff66c1123889b7d8" alt="Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 top view buttons comparison Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 top view buttons comparison"
Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching specifications. The pic below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the X2D and T Type 701.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The X2D with its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Hasselblad X2D will provide you with greater detail using its extra 84MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The younger X2D will have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fce/b7fce7eb00500ed1ea241f688792cd856d2c78bc" alt="Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 sensor size comparison Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 sensor size comparison"
Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd67a/cd67a90e377f1bc397ac9db90eb36835bca36efa" alt="Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Hasselblad X2D vs Leica T Type 701 Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | Leica T Typ 701 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model type | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Leica T Typ 701 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2022-09-07 | 2014-04-24 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 4944 x 3278 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12500 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 294 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Leica L |
Total lenses | 13 | 4 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.60 inches | 3.7 inches |
Display resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,300k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4080s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/6000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.3 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 895g (1.97 lb) | 384g (0.85 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1082 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | 400 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BP-DC13 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $8,199 | $1,603 |